Sunday, December 03, 2006

2008 Porsche Cayenne





Here it is.
Not sure what else is new besides the slight body changes.
Mileage is said to be improved by 10% accorss the board.
It still looks good.
So ....

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

Its as ugly as ever, only slightly different. Why do they even bother?

carlisimo said...

Looks better. Less frog-like, but possibly too close to a Peugeot fascia. But better.

Anonymous said...

Looks like they made a change in the rear just for change sake, the new rounder tailamps look cheaper than before.

Anonymous said...

HUGE improvement! Still the runt of the litter though.

Anonymous said...

Le Québécois

The Q7 is a lot better for the look. You will buy the Porsche only for the name...

pastorshannon said...

ICK!

disegno said...

does anyone else see the most recent generation camaro in the third pic? (the round, bulbous headlights with a gaping mouth)

ok. i like the headlights better. it wouldn't look so darn awful if those air dams/intakes/whatever were smaller.

and the rear taillights are lame. i agree with 10:27's comments about them.

Anonymous said...

i've always loved the cayenne but i can't justify spending that much money for not much more than a name. looks like the tailights are finally LED's

Anonymous said...

The first gen was appealing beacuse the idea of a Porsche SUV created a WOW effect. This rendition has nothing going for it. I just don't see it. The tailights are wannabe X5 and I think the next uber euro SUV is AUDI's V10 Q7.

Anonymous said...

ill be the oddball here dont see a need to analyze the shape of headlamps and tail lamps, lol they are headlamps and taillamps....but this is just a refresh dont think much should be expected, autoweek just saids more horsepower which was needed in the lower models. my problem with the porsche is why does it have the least luxurious interior, and its the most expensive car out of the 3 (toureg, q7, and cayenne) this makes no sense to me. the q7 and toureg have nicer interiors

Anonymous said...

ill be the oddball here dont see a need to analyze the shape of headlamps and tail lamps, lol they are headlamps and taillamps....but this is just a refresh dont think much should be expected, autoweek just saids more horsepower which was needed in the lower models. my problem with the porsche is why does it have the least luxurious interior, and its the most expensive car out of the 3 (toureg, q7, and cayenne) this makes no sense to me. the q7 and toureg have nicer interiors

Anonymous said...

there are no main diffrents wat so ever wow the tail lights have LED lights so wat i hate this car ford expedition is way better than this car and it is less cheaper

Anonymous said...

I love the Cayenne, I'm not a SUV fan but if I had to pick one this would be it. It is expensive but so is the POS Escalade and you can
't really compare the two !

Anonymous said...

THE UGLY ONE!!!

Anonymous said...

boring porsche, how couild you go from chic 1980's champion to predictable and boring??? if you look up repetitive in the dictionary, they should have a picture of a porsche

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous said...
there are no main diffrents wat so ever wow the tail lights have LED lights so wat i hate this car ford expedition is way better than this car and it is less cheaper

8:19 PM"

so from what your saying the expedition is more expensive...and you can't compare those 2 suvs. they appeal tototally different democratics

Anonymous said...

The Cayenne is for people who are looking at the X5 or the ML-class or the Audi Q7, not for people who are looking at the Expedition or the Escalade.

Anonymous said...

What's different besides the looks? Well, the Turbo gets 500 HP now, for one.