GT-R. Almost practical?
Last Updated:
Kind of. But again, I don’t see any headrests on the rear.
I know it’s not a family car, but if you put seats back there, at least they should be safe.
Last Updated:
Kind of. But again, I don’t see any headrests on the rear.
I know it’s not a family car, but if you put seats back there, at least they should be safe.
Kudos Vince for getting these first images of the interior. Nice job.
Lot’s of cheap-looking plastics. The back seat looks like a 70s Firebird.
I have mixed feelings about this car. It looks a lot like the Z (headlights, overall shape) and the interior looks like an Audi meets the Kit Car. But I guess this car is more about performance.
I think you’ll sit so low, you won’t need the headrests, besides, you’ll be eating your knees if you sit back there.
There’s a lot I like about this car. But what I don’t like about it is, the front. Man talk about a face only a mother could love. It’s BUUUUUUTT ugly. I don’t like the hvac/stereo controls on the center stack. It looks cheap. And I don’t like the way they squared off the instrument cluster. It looks more at home in a car from the 1980’s. It does need back seat headrests. And I guess $80,000 only gets you ONE backseat cupholder? WTF! Other than that it’s an awesome car! 0 to 60 in 3.5?! WOW…that’s awesome!
John M.