More MDX photos…

Last Updated:



Conversation 12 comments

  1. It just keeps getting uglier with every photo you post. The MDX and CR-V came from one ghastly gene pool.

  2. Ugly or not people will still buy into Honda & Acura; actually, i should say no matter what styles BMW, Toyota, or Honda have, their cars will still fly from dealers’ lots.

  3. For something that weighs 5000lbs and sucks gas, and is very slow, it doesn’t look very spacious in the back.

  4. This one is actually one of the lightest (only heavier than RX),the best performance(v6 wise), the most fuel economical(again, only RX is better), the most versatile, and the most spacious luxury mide-size crossover you can buy. In another word, “best in class”. I cant argue with u, if u have an edge against its style; but If you have any complain about weight or fuel economy or performance, drive a mini.

  5. Looks great; I love the new “trucky” front end; looks better than the softer Crossovers out there {RX330=YAWN}.

    Coupled with the new 3.7L, it should be a winner.

  6. I cant argue with u, if u have an edge against its style; but If you have any complain about weight or fuel economy or performance, drive a mini.

    Well, about fuel economy, the Mini isn’t the best. Well, actually, it very well could be in the US, as the Smart isn’t there yet. No, I’ll bet the Yaris is better.

    For performace and weight, however, the Mini is the way to go, unless by performance and weight you mean you want it heavy and slow, in which case you’re on the right page. No, go for a GMC.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *